Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne has a plan of his own – to arm one educator in every school. Under the proposal, either the school’s principal or his or her designee could receive free training on how to use a weapon, and be able to carry that weapon within the school. Every school would have a choice whether or not to participate.
Monthly Archives: December 2012
Arizona AG Tom Horne on Proposal to Arm School Principals: If We Don’t Do Anything to Protect Our Kids, We’ll Regret It | Fox News Insider
With President Obama so ill-intentioned toward the United States and its future, negotiations between him and with those of us who oppose him are pointless. CANADA FREE PRESS
Why are so many Americans so blind? It is time for America to wake the H*** up. Stop being a bunch of beggers and EARN a living. Novel idea, huh?
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
Here is excerpt from the article that shows what is wrong with this treaty as the WOLVES try to pull the wool over our eyes.
“Anyone who claims the CRPD merely codifies existing U.S. disabled-rights law, as distinct from prescribing major new extensions of it, cannot have read its text with care. Beyond that, the treaty would if taken seriously bid to wrest from the control of elected U.S. lawmakers the future course of many important domestic policy issues, from the structuring of Social Security disability benefits to the question of whether prospective law and medical students should have a right to extra time in taking exams to accommodate their learning disabilities. When it’s pointed out that the convention by its own text requires radical revamping of many existing policies, advocates respond with the peculiar argument that, after all, we shouldn’t take its provisions all that seriously; other ratifying countries are already blithely ignoring their obligations under it, and the United States will be free to do so too, especially as the mechanisms for enforcing it are (for the moment) fairly toothless. It is at best a cynical argument that deserves senators’ rejection.
The convention consists of a preamble and 50 (!) articles. Under Article 4 (1)(b), ratifying states pledge to “take all appropriate measures, including legislation, to modify or abolish existing laws, regulations, customs and practices that constitute discrimination against persons with disabilities,” and under 4 (1)(d), to “refrain from engaging in any act or practice that is inconsistent” with the convention. Who gets to define whether an existing law, regulation, custom, or practice “constitute[s] discrimination against” the deaf, blind, epileptic, diabetic, or paraplegic? Or — to name a few of the other groups currently deemed disabled — persons afflicted with psychosis, cancer, emotional dysfunction, narcolepsy, learning disability, past alcohol or drug abuse if in rehab, or serious contagious disease? Your guess is as good as the Post editorialists’, except that they seem to have spent no time guessing or so much as thinking about the matter.
Will states and localities have to change their laws, or just the federal government? Glad you asked: Article 4, Section 5 says “The provisions of the present Convention shall extend to all parts of federal states without any limitations or exceptions.”