RSS

Monthly Archives: December 2012

Arizona AG Tom Horne on Proposal to Arm School Principals: If We Don’t Do Anything to Protect Our Kids, We’ll Regret It | Fox News Insider

Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne has a plan of his own – to arm one educator in every school. Under the proposal, either the school’s principal or his or her designee could receive free training on how to use a weapon, and be able to carry that weapon within the school. Every school would have a choice whether or not to participate.

via Arizona AG Tom Horne on Proposal to Arm School Principals: If We Don’t Do Anything to Protect Our Kids, We’ll Regret It | Fox News Insider.

Advertisements
 
Comments Off on Arizona AG Tom Horne on Proposal to Arm School Principals: If We Don’t Do Anything to Protect Our Kids, We’ll Regret It | Fox News Insider

Posted by on December 31, 2012 in EDUCATION, US POLITICS

 

Tags: , ,

Letter A 95 Year Old Pearl Harbor Survivor Wrote To President Obama

Steve Forbes 24 December FACT CHECKED & VERIFIED:

“Dear President Obama,

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year. People meeting me for the first time don’t believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos’n Mate. Now I live in a “rest home” located on the western end of Pearl Harbor , allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

So here goes.

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.

I can’t figure out what country you are the president of.
You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:

” We’re no longer a Christian nation”
” America is arrogant”

– (Your wife even
announced to the world,” America is mean-spirited. ” Please tell her to try preaching that nonsense to 23 generations of our
war dead buried all over the globe who died for no other reason than to free a whole lot of strangers from tyranny and hopelessness.)

I’d say shame on the both of you, but I don’t think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you. To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said,” America hasn’t lived up to her ideals.”

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British? Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War? I hope you didn’t mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

I don’t think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination. You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

Shape up and start acting like an American. If you don’t, I’ll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue . You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don’t want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts , who was putting up a fight? You don’t mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don’t want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing. I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you’re the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job. When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him. But if you’re not in this fight to win, then get out. The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you’re thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president.
You’re not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy. That’s not our greatest threat. Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.

And I sure as hell don’t want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle…

Sincerely,
Harold B. Estes

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 28, 2012 in EDUCATION, SOCIAL, US POLITICS

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Firemen Shooter Alread Barred From Owning Guns

GUN CONTROLLERSIt is time to reevaluate our gun laws!  But more important is time to reevaluate our criminal laws and sanctions! As you read the following article, you will realize that criminals do not obey the laws. Only law-abiding citizens obey the laws and are put in jeopardy by the foolish anti-gun supporters.

The problem is that there are not stricter consequences for the use of guns in crimes as well as stricter consequences for all crimes. While even a dumb dog lick a hot stove twice, criminals don’t have that much sense, OR the penalty for doing crimes is not “hot enough.” Currently, our laws go soft on the perpetrator of crimes.

The problem is not stricter gun laws, but, stricter penalties and stronger enforcement! It is time that we start thinking smarter. Those who purport to support stricter gun laws are thinking stupid. It’s time to wake up!

Firemen Shooter Alread Barred From Owning Guns.

 
Comments Off on Firemen Shooter Alread Barred From Owning Guns

Posted by on December 27, 2012 in SOCIAL, US POLITICS

 

Tags: , , , ,

Canada Sees Through Obama’s Plan To Destroy the USA

With President Obama so ill-intentioned toward the United States and its future, negotiations between him and with those of us who oppose him are pointless. CANADA FREE PRESS

Why are so many Americans so blind?  It is time for America to wake the H*** up. Stop being a bunch of beggers and EARN a living.  Novel idea, huh?

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51631

 
Comments Off on Canada Sees Through Obama’s Plan To Destroy the USA

Posted by on December 10, 2012 in GLOBAL POLITICS, US POLITICS

 

Tags: , ,

CRPD – A bad disabled-rights treaty with the UN | The Daily Caller

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,

Here is excerpt from the article that shows what is wrong with this treaty as the WOLVES try to pull the wool over our eyes.

Anyone who claims the CRPD merely codifies existing U.S. disabled-rights law, as distinct from prescribing major new extensions of it, cannot have read its text with care. Beyond that, the treaty would if taken seriously bid to wrest from the control of elected U.S. lawmakers the future course of many important domestic policy issues, from the structuring of Social Security disability benefits to the question of whether prospective law and medical students should have a right to extra time in taking exams to accommodate their learning disabilities. When it’s pointed out that the convention by its own text requires radical revamping of many existing policies, advocates respond with the peculiar argument that, after all, we shouldn’t take its provisions all that seriously; other ratifying countries are already blithely ignoring their obligations under it, and the United States will be free to do so too, especially as the mechanisms for enforcing it are (for the moment) fairly toothless. It is at best a cynical argument that deserves senators’ rejection.

The convention consists of a preamble and 50 (!) articles. Under Article 4 (1)(b), ratifying states pledge to “take all appropriate measures, including legislation, to modify or abolish existing laws, regulations, customs and practices that constitute discrimination against persons with disabilities,” and under 4 (1)(d), to “refrain from engaging in any act or practice that is inconsistent” with the convention. Who gets to define whether an existing law, regulation, custom, or practice “constitute[s] discrimination against” the deaf, blind, epileptic, diabetic, or paraplegic? Or — to name a few of the other groups currently deemed disabled — persons afflicted with psychosis, cancer, emotional dysfunction, narcolepsy, learning disability, past alcohol or drug abuse if in rehab, or serious contagious disease? Your guess is as good as the Post editorialists’, except that they seem to have spent no time guessing or so much as thinking about the matter.

Will states and localities have to change their laws, or just the federal government? Glad you asked: Article 4, Section 5 says “The provisions of the present Convention shall extend to all parts of federal states without any limitations or exceptions.”

via A bad disabled-rights treaty | The Daily Caller.

 
Comments Off on CRPD – A bad disabled-rights treaty with the UN | The Daily Caller

Posted by on December 4, 2012 in Deaf, GLOBAL POLITICS, US POLITICS

 

Tags: , , , , , ,