Tag Archives: betrayal

World Leader Goes To The UN And Drops Bombshell Claim About Obama Admin And Iran

this article is greatly disturbing. this shows the treachery and deceptiveness of the current President of the United States and his administration! he has gone behind the backs of the American people to try to gain nuclear fuel for Iran. All the while, when the USA is hholding sanctions against Iran to develop its nuclear power and especially the bomb. This all happened BEFORE – BEFORE – the Iran Deal was being negotiated!

This man who took an oath to defend America against its enemies and to support the Constitution has been using his administration to fight for the destruction of the United States and betray us and our interests abroad.

At the United Nations. He was exposed for having gone around the backs of the American people to violate the sanctions placed on Iran and violate our treaties with our allies and with the American people and her enemies – our enemies!

Read this article and see what a backstabbing trader our president is and how he continually makes war with this nation, all the while only giving lip service to America.

Source: World Leader Goes To The UN And Drops Bombshell Claim About Obama Admin And Iran

Comments Off on World Leader Goes To The UN And Drops Bombshell Claim About Obama Admin And Iran

Posted by on October 1, 2015 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , ,

Netanyahu: Deal with Iran would be a mistake of historic proportions – Washington Times

Since Obama has been embroiled in so many scandeles, this one may have been overlooked. But it is a major mess that Obama has created, showing his bias toward the Muslim Jihadists. He has KNOWN Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers working near him who influence and even advise him.

I suppose it should not be a shocker that he has been working secretly with Iran to lessen the consequences of the fiscal sanctions on this nation because of their seeking nuclear weapons. Since this has been exposed, Netanyahu has spoken out regarding the cost of Obama’s betrayal of our long time ally.

Thus, this article from Netanyahu speaking out fro under the bus…

Netanyahu: Deal with Iran would be a mistake of historic proportions – Washington Times.


Comments Off on Netanyahu: Deal with Iran would be a mistake of historic proportions – Washington Times

Posted by on November 18, 2013 in GLOBAL POLITICS, US POLITICS


Tags: , , , ,

Abortion by Sex| Read Then Weep| Then Buy the Book

Read this is you are appauled by “Abortion by Sex.” This is an excerpt*


The basic problem of the Christians in this country in the last eighty years or so, in regard to society and in regard to government, is that they have seen things in bits and pieces instead of totals.

They have very gradually become disturbed over permissiveness, pornography, the public schools, the breakdown of the family, and finally abortion.  But they have not seen this as a totality – each thing being a part, a symptom, of a much larger problem.  They have failed to see that all of this has come about due to a shift in world view – that is, through a fundamental change in the overall way people think and view the world and life as a whole.  This shift has been away from a world view that was at least vaguely Christian in the people’s memory (even if they were not individually Christian) toward something completely different – for a world view based upon the idea that the final reality is impersonal matter or energy shaped into its present form by impersonal chance.  They have not seen that this world view has taken the place of the one that had previously dominated northern European culture, including the United States, which was at least Christian in memory, even if the individuals were not individually Christian.

These two world views stand as totals incomplete antithesis to each other in content and also in their natural results – including sociological and governmental results, and specifically including law.

It is not that these two world views are different only in how they understand the nature of reality and existence.  They also inevitably produce totally different results.  The operative word here is inevitably.  It is not just that they happen to bring forth different results, but it is absolutely inevitable that there will bring forth different results.

Why have the Christians been so slow to understand this?  There are various reasons, but the central one is a defective view of Christianity.  This has its roots in the Pietistic movement under the leadership of P. J. Spener in the seventeenth century.  Pietism began as a healthy protest against formalism and a too abstract Christianity.  But it had a deficient, “platonic” spirituality.  It was platonic in the sense that Pietism made a sharp division between the “spiritual” and “material” world – giving little, or no, importance to the “material” world.  The totality of human existence was not afforded a proper place.  In particular, it neglected the intellectual dimension of Christianity.

Christianity and spirituality were shut up to a small, isolated part of life.  The totality of reality was ignored by the pietistic thinking.  Let me quickly say that in one sense Christians should be Pietists in that Christianity is not just a set of doctrines, even the right documents.  Every doctrine is in some way to have an effect upon our lives.  But the poor side of Pietism and its resulting platonic outlook have really been a tragedy not only in many peoples individual lives, but in our total culture.

True spirituality covers all of reality.  There are things the Bible tells us as absolutes, which are sinful – which do not conform to the character of God.  But aside from these the Lordship of Christ covers all of life and all of life equally.  It is not only that true spirituality covers all of life, but it covers all parts of the spectrum of life equally.  In this sense there is nothing concerning reality that is not spiritual.

Related to this, it seems to me, in fact that many Christians do not mean what I mean when I say Christianity is true, or Truth.  They are Christians and they believe in, let us say, the truth of creation, the truth of the virgin birth, the truth of Christ’s miracles, Christ substitutionary death, and His coming again.  But they stopped there with these and other individual truths.

When I say Christianity is true I mean it is true to total reality – the total of what is, beginning with the central reality, the objective existence of the personal – infinite God.  Christianity is not just a series of truth but Truth – Truth about all of reality.  And the holding to that Truth intellectually – and then in some poor way living upon that Truth, the Truth of what is – brings forth not only certain personal results, but also governmental and legal results.

Now let’s go over to the other side – to those who hold the materialistic final reality concept.  They saw the complete and total difference between the two portions more quickly than Christians.  There were the Huxley’s, George Bernard Shaw (1856 – 1950), and many others who understood a long time ago that there are two total concepts of reality, and that it was one total reality against the other and not just a set of isolated and separated differences.  The Humanist Manifesto I, published in 1933, showed the crystal clarity of their comprehension of the totality of what is involved.  It was to our shame that Julian (1887 – 1975) and Aldus Huxley (1894 – 1963), and others like them, understood much earlier than Christians that these two world views are two total concepts of reality standing in antithesis to each other.  We should be utterly ashamed that this is the fact.

They understood not only that there were two totally different concepts but that they would bring forth two totally different conclusions, both for individuals and for society.  What we must understand is that the two world views really do bring forth an inevitable certainty not only personal differences, but also total differences in regard to society, government, and law.

There is no way to mix these two total world views.  They are separate entities that cannot be synthesized.  Yet we must say that liberal theology, the very essence of it from its beginning, is an attempt to mix the two.  Liberal theology tried to bring forth a mixture soon after the Enlightenment and has tried to synthesize these two views right up to our own day.  But in each case when the chips are down, these liberal theologians have always come down, as naturally as a ship coming into home port, on the side of the nonreligious humanist.  They do this with certainty because of what their liberal theology really is is humanism expressed in theological terms instead of philosophic or other terms.

“An example of coming down naturally on the side of nonreligious humanist is the article by Charles Hawthorne in the January 21, 1981, issue of The Christian Century, pages 42 – 45.  It is, “Concerning Abortion, an Attempt at a Rational View.”  He begins by equating the fact that the human fetus is alive with the fact that mosquitoes and bacteria are also alive.  That is, he begins to assume that human life is not unique.  He then continues by saying that even after the baby is born it is not fully human until its social relations develop (though he says the infant does have some primitive social relations an unborn fetus does not have).  His conclusion is, “Nevertheless, I have little sympathy with the idea that infanticide is just another form of murder.  Persons who are already functionally persons in the full sense have more important rights than infants.”  He then, logically, takes the next step: “Does this distinction apply to the killing of a hopelessly senile person or one in a permanent coma?  For me it does.”  No atheistic humanist could sat it with greater clarity.  It is significant at this point to note that many denominations controlled by liberal theology have come out, publicly and strongly, in favor of abortion.

Doctor Martin E. Marty is one of the respected, theologically liberal spokesmen.  He is an associate editor all of The Christian Century and Fairfax M. Cohen distinguished service professor at the University of Chicago Divinity school.  He is often quoted in the secular press as a spokesman for “mainstream” Christianity.  In a Christian Century article in January 7 – 14, 1981, issue (pages 13 – 17 with an additional on page 31), he has as an article entitled: “Dear Republicans: A Letter on Humanisms.”  In it he brilliantly confuses the terms “being human,” humanism, the humanities and being “in love with humanity.”  Why does he do this?  As a historian  he knows the distinction of these words, but when one is done with these pages the poor reader who knows no better is left with the eradication of the total distinction between the Christian position and the humanist one.  I admire the cleverness of the article… (Quoted from The Christian Manifesto by Francis Schaeffer)
 *after which I hope you buy the book. (It can be purchased at Amazon or other fine book stores.)

“A Christian Manifesto” Chapter One
by Francis Shaeffer
NOTE:  read these to see he was not exagerating!
The Communist Manifesto, 1848.
Humanist Manifesto I 1933
Humanist Manifesto II 1973.

Comments Off on Abortion by Sex| Read Then Weep| Then Buy the Book



Tags: , , , , ,


This is the greatest betrayal since Benedict Arnold! If a president would’ve done this back in the founding days of our nation, we know what they would’ve done to him, they would’ve tried him for treason! This is the Benedict Arnold of the 21st century, he is as diabolical as Judas.

Can you imagine a president doing something worse than this,a sitting president? Even President Jimmy Carter wouldn’t have betrayed us like this. See below what President Obama said and then the response of the President of Russia. This was not intended to be caught on tape! But ABC news did get it. Their comments were made during a meeting in Seoul, South Korea, and not intended to be made public.

We should be thankful that this was caught so we will be aware of his plans. But more than that, we should be on guard! Could impeachment be in order? Now read the comments below:

(AP) “This is my last election,”Obama is heard telling outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.“After my election I have more flexibility.”

Medvedev replied,according to a tape by ABC News:“I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir,”an apparent reference to incoming President Vladmir Putin.

Obama and Medvedev did not intend for their comments to be public.”


Awake! Awake America! It is past time to be aroused out of your sleep. A famous politician and one deemed one of the wisest in history said, “When I saw, I reflected upon it; I looked, and received instruction. “A little sleep, a little slumber, A little folding of the hands to rest,” Then your poverty will come as a robber and your want like an armed man. I applied my heart to what I observed and learned a lesson from what I saw: A little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to rest — and poverty will come on you like a thief and scarcity like an armed man.

We have seen, the Obama short-change the American people in many situations. He has bowed to foreign kings and leaders, he is told other nations to “drill baby drill,” but refuses to allow drilling off the coast of the USA by our companies. He is told other nations, we will be their best customer to buy their oil, we have seen him stop the National Day of Prayer, but open it up to Muslim special days. Over, and over and over he has betrayed Americans and our national interests.

Now he wants to bring us in submission to Russia! He has sworn to uphold the Constitution, but at every turn he moves away from it, refuses to obey the laws of the land, which he is sworn to uphold.

He as much as told Russians to wait until after his election, then he would have more freedom to sell America down the river, to throw us under the bus.

How do you think our allies feel about this? How do you think Israel feels about this at this time? How do you think Americans should feel about it at this time?

This should outrage every American who has any patriotic blood in them and cares about this nation being strong for their children and grandchildren. If they don’t, they fall into the same category as Obama.

It becomes more and more obvious that America is going to have bus tracks all over it when Obama is done with the citizens of America.

Obama will “ACT” stronger during the election, then SELL OUT our missle defense system to the RUSSIANS if REELECTED!

This is a risk we can not afford.  Pray for our nation and for God to protect us from Barack Obama.

See following article:
Obama tells Russia he will have more flexibility on missile defence after November elections – Yahoo! News.


Posted by on March 26, 2012 in GLOBAL POLITICS, US POLITICS


Tags: , , , , , , , ,